Manuel Mazza vs William Grant Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In terms of second serve effectiveness, both players have similar performance: Mazza at 43.03% and Grant at 43.14%. How significant is this small difference? It might slightly favor Grant in close second serve exchanges.
• Regarding return games, Grant achieves better results on opponents' second serves, winning 46.44% of points compared to Mazza's 44.69%.
• When it comes to returning first serves, Mazza shows a distinct advantage with a 30.97% win rate versus Grant's 25.93%.
• Under pressure, Grant excels by saving more breakpoints (51.11%) than Mazza (47.65%), indicating mental resilience in key situations.
• Mazza boasts a higher match win percentage over the past year, securing 71.67% of victories, while Grant's performance lingers at 47.54%.
• Looking at career surface statistics, Mazza is stronger on clay with a 60% win rate, whereas Grant's top performances are on indoor hard courts with 58% wins.
• The competitive level differs slightly, as Mazza dominates lower-tier events with a 74.14% win rate, while Grant holds a 53.85% win rate in similar events.
• Analyzing opponent quality, Grant has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, suggesting a potentially more challenging competition level.
• In deciding sets, Mazza tends to perform better, winning 53% compared to Grant's 33%. If a match is close, Mazza might have the edge here.
• Assessing break point conversion, Mazza is more efficient with a 42.27% success rate, whereas Grant converts 34.34% of opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (July 24, 2025, UTC):

Mazza and Grant show close competition in several areas, yet key metrics highlight distinct advantages. Mazza demonstrates superior performance in both overall win rate and crucial match-deciding metrics. Although Grant has faced slightly stronger opponents, Mazza's ability to capitalize on break points and sustain performance in deciding sets could be pivotal.

Mazza's proficiency on clay and Granta's preference for indoor hard surfaces suggest surface conditions might also influence the outcome. With these observations, Mazza appears to be the more consistent player under pressure, particularly in tight moments.

Given these strengths and recent performance patterns, Mazza is more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.